551

(33 replies, posted in Starmada)

now in the FAQ, and so are teleporters for those who care smile

edit this to change it

http://mj12games.com/faq/index.php/Equipment_unaffected_by_Tech_Level

552

(33 replies, posted in Starmada)

P55 of the compendium talks about Towing and is, to date the only "official" rendering of one ship carrying another that I am aware of (pre-compendium does not apply)

However, Dan's post on the costs of carrying another ship comes pretty close, I'd say.

This way you get your dropships and PT boats both.

553

(7 replies, posted in Discussion)

um,

Monkeys are cool...

554

(13 replies, posted in Starmada)

You are correct, Dan.  Cheaper means "costs less"

I get confused sometimes.

sorry

555

(13 replies, posted in Starmada)

ah, maybe some excel guru can look into that wink

556

(13 replies, posted in Starmada)

From the Max Burn Page

By Cheaper, I mean smaller wink

"""
A PDS is as effective (and has as much effect on DR) as 3 shields, although it can't take as many hits. As seen in the graph at right, it also takes less space, on ships up to size 19! For ships of size 4 or less, a PDS takes less space than even one shield -- a definite win.
"""

a little confused, but...

jim

557

(13 replies, posted in Starmada)

you get better coverage and cheaper defense with shield 2 and pds, that's what I meant.

558

(13 replies, posted in Starmada)

Nope, that's the thing.

Usually, there's not a ton of Qs on a ship, and the vulnerability of going from 3 shield to 0 shield in one hit is a biggie.

And point for point, they are cheaper than a 3 point shield.

Here's something Peter Drake put together to show that ratio:

http://www.lclark.edu/~drake/starmada/maxburn.html

a fine reference and the Man who brought us the Drake Notation(tm)

559

(52 replies, posted in Defiance)

and the FAQ is updated

http://mj12games.com/faq/index.php/Category:Defiance

560

(9 replies, posted in Discussion)

*Gasp* a fan???? or warmaster???? I'm crushed!

Did you try the specialty games website? (he asked knowing you probably did already, but I had to add some value to th conversation)

561

(9 replies, posted in Discussion)

I read somewhere that it was bad management that caused the downfall of BoFA.  They also scrapped the line cause it wasn't making money.

I'd rather use For the Masses anyway.

I might need more heroscape terrain though!

562

(67 replies, posted in Starmada)

That's exactly what expendable weapons are used for.

You add just the shots you have ammo for. then when you've shot the weapon, you strike off a box as if it were hit.

how's that different from a weapon with only a few shots?

563

(2 replies, posted in Aces at Dawn)

Yup

Collinsville Illinois,

I'll be there saturdy morning through sunday afternoon. Provided there's a hotel room, that is.

564

(2 replies, posted in Aces at Dawn)

I will be running a bunch of demo games of Aces at Dawn at Die Con this weekend.

Look for the guy with snoopy vs the red baron coming out of the boom box and the cool planes!

smile

565

(8 replies, posted in Starmada)

well, now that you've FIXED them they point the same direction.

Or maybe I just have to uncross my eyes.

566

(8 replies, posted in Starmada)

shouldn't the front point the same direction?

otherwise which is right?[/b]

567

(12 replies, posted in Discussion)

rub it in why don'ch'a

smile

568

(2 replies, posted in Starmada)

okay, I'll fix it when I get a chance...

sorry

569

(7 replies, posted in Iron Stars)

No, mike, he means lateral, as in lateral thinking, moving to the side a lot rather than taking things one step at a time.

What book is that from?  The description with matchsticks was cool, I thought.

The size of the counters is the size of he ship

Tiny ones are for tiny ships, gigantic ones are for gigantic ships.

Yes, any weapon can attack fighters.

571

(2 replies, posted in Discussion)

spam

572

(20 replies, posted in Iron Stars)

Yeah,

I've been known to mislable ships for that reason, to confuse the enemy, not because I don't have a clue what the difference between a battleship and a cruiser is... yeah that's it!

(All I know about sea combat, I've learned from Milton Bradley's Historical Combat Simulation "Battleship"... as in "you sunk my...")

jim

Moose is, of course, being used as a verb in that phrase...

murtalianconfederacy wrote:

One-turn wonder.


There's no need to outlaw a combination if there is some way of countering it. That would be like outlawing Scissors because someone keeps playing Paper. If they keep playing Scissors, play Rock.

I think you'll both find that smaller, better designed ships will do you both better than a single ship.

I personally would rather put 5x100 point ships on the board than 1x600 point ship.  You simply have too many targets to shoot at...

I think you're seeing the problems with the bigger ships in the design system.  It's been created to push you toward the smaller hull sizes.

(IIRC)

I can't even imagine these ships.  You're bandying about 21" torpedos and 14" main guns which I have no reference to in starmada.

Could you post your designs

thanks!