You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Play nice. (This means you.)
Logins from the previous forum have been carried over; if you have difficulty logging in, please try resetting your password before contacting us. Attachments did not survive the migration--many apologies, but we're lucky we kept what we could!
mj12games.com/forum → Posts by Inari7
That does not explain the excessive SU I now have left over.
Thanks I will have to try it long hand again some time.
I did the math for the above ship long hand, and came up with numbers similar to the 2.2 and 2.4 SXCA's. SXCA 2.5 is not even close.
The math I did for the SU cost was perfect when compared with SXCA 2.4, but I was 4 points off when I figured the CR. I did realize I was off by .1 on the weapon CR cost. (I rounded up to high)
....................Doug
With SXCA 2.2 this design is CR76 with 118 SU units left.
I guess I will have to try the math long hand to see what is correct.
both ships have the same design
This was made with SXCA 2.5g
D-7a class Klingon Battle cruiser ( 58 ) with 220 space units left over
Hull: 6 5 4 3 2 1
Engines: 5 4 3 2 1
Shields: 3 2 1
[a] Disrupter [4/8/12, 5+, ROF 2]
ab, ab, bd, ac
Hyperdrive [O]
1[HQ], 2[Ea], 3[Ha], 4[E], 5[H], 6[S]
TL: E: 0 S: -1 W: -1 Q: 0
The other ship is the same except the CR is 76 with only one space unit left over made with SXCA 2.4 last modified Dec 3rd 04
Thats a bit of diffrence.
.............Doug
Hi I have been using SXCA 2.4 for designing ships and it seems that there is a large diffrnce between 2.4 and 2.5
I have been using -1 tec for weapons and shields if that helps.
What SXCA is the more correct one?
Thanks.............Doug
Wow looks great thank you very much.
.......................Doug
Has anyone made a firing arc chart that is about a 1/2 or 1/4 page in size?
I want to run a Starmada game at a convention and the only thing I can think of that would be a little confusing is the firing arcs.
Thanks.................Doug
mj12games.com/forum → Posts by Inari7
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.