I game with John/Nahuris and thought I would add my two cents in as he tries to be a little more diplomatic than I am sometimes. We have a player with a bad case of rules lawyerism to constantly deal with. We don't want to exclude him because a) he owns a lot of the figs we use as he had a lot of time neither John or I had and b) can't exclude him without excluding his wife who is a solid player and tactician that is fun to fight against (not to mention a challenge). Also we do multiple games, Starmada, BattleTech (both tabletop and RPG), Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay ... well you get the idea. The gentleman in question is very enthusiastic, but also once spent 2 weeks with one of the RPG rulebooks working out the shortest way to make himself the most powerful in the shortest amount of time. Even though the mixture made absolutely no sense overall. Consequently we need to be able to say this is the answer or have the entire game day devolve into a this is what the rules say vs. this is what common sense dictates argument which destroys a lot of the fun for everyone (including his wife).

Thank you for the information Mr. Kast. Just so everyone knows I have made a change to the cheat sheet showing that a Q hit CAN destroy a spinal mount and replaced the file with the corrected version.

FYI: The cheat sheet was put together as a quick reference guide during play to avoid have to constantly pull out the rule book. As to the AB firing arc this was based off of the diagram on the bottom left of page 31 section C.27 which diagrams an AB firing arc for a standard spinal mount. The illustration on the right is slightly different because of alterations under Anime-Style Spinal Mounts section C.27.1.

Abraham E. Frank :?