Seems like a Federation heavy cruiser ought to get its clock cleaned by a Klingon Battlecruiser. Yet from what I can tell they seem comparable.
Is this just because Fed tech is supposed to be so inherently better than Klingon tech. . . or just a fast and loose application of terms like Heavy cruiser vs. Battlecruiser. . .or just some legacy from Star Trek lore. . . just wondering how this situation came to be.
Different factions use different ship class names for what are basically comparable craft. So yes a Klingon Battlecruiser is roughly comparable to a Federation Heavy Cruiser. FASA's old Star Trek Tactical Combat Simulator was supposidely even worse, and one Fed CA was a match for not one but THREE Klingon BCs.
But in SFU other factions might have say Heavy Destroyer, and another has Light Cruiser but the two are roughly an even match.
The biggest thing I see that feels off is the ranges. Effective phaser range always exceeded photon and disruptor range. One of my favorite tactics back in the day was to stay just beyond effective disruptor/photon range and chew up the target with my phasers. The occasional torp hit was too infrequent to hurt and disruptor damage dropped so drastically at range they didn't matter. With a photon only being fired every other turn a sqd of small fast ships can rip a heavy to shreds
I'm surprised such a tactic worked. With the ability to soak damage with battery power I'm not sure how delivering the occasional one or two points of phaser damage is going to do much of anything. Would make for a very long game if nothing else.