okee dokee !!!!!

thanks bunches !!!!

what, i can't do the same thing too many times in a row.
it would get boring............and i don't want that.

so one could use the PI tables to build SI with an AR 0 ? Simply treat as SI in all respects (Agility mods, AoE vulnerability, etc.) ?

That would look so cool in the official errata !!!!!! !!!! !!!! ! ! !!!

thanks !!!!!!!!!

Standard Infantry with an AR of 0.

Table 2.1:Standard Infantry Costs (pg 94) does not list any frames with an AR of 0.  But in the Armor Rating description on page 11 it states that .." standard infantry will always have a zero or positive AR".

this would make converting 40K easier, as i've come to the conclusion that 4+ armor in 40K is equivalent to a SI with an AR of 0.

thanks

i was afraid you would say that........... ........

now i have to re-calibrate my brain.......... :evil: ........

:?: but i don't know what i did with my sonic scewdriver and hydro-spanner..... :?:         

Another Question:

  Is it possible/permissable to place a "weapon link" (infantry unit augmentation) on a vehicle weapon ???

  I'm trying to figure out how to design a Volcano FROG BAP for the Infranites.  The problem is that it has  four linked FROG pods, a Chain Cannon and a vehicular CDW.
  My idea was to put two FROG pods (each with a weapon link) in one "fire action" and the Cannon and CDW in the other.

  For those that don't know, the Volcano is an Anime Mecha.

I'm asking this because it just seems silly that i would have to create two versions of the FROG pod. One for infantry (single pod) and the other for the Volcano (quad pod). If i could create a FR 4 template weapon with 4 shots (16 total) that i didn't have to fire at full FR so i could conserve ammo.....i wouldn't be asking this question.

I'd be asking for a much higher max vehicle weapon cost

thanks again,
jim a.

another bump

umm....nothing....'cause i posted the question before checking the book :oops:  :oops:

but i have another question ??

is there a "hard cap" on the size of the hull ? cause the SXCA only allows a 20 hull as the maximum.

thanks

aaahh !!!

but you see, i made them FR 3.

i figured the cost of the rocket compared to the combined cost of the rifle. the rifle has two tandem slots and the rocket (or the war leader/chief's GL) is parallel to the rifle.

i've also just thought about having a three slot parallel combo for it. you know, due to weapon design advances and stuff.

or just "average" the long and short range rounds for the rifle so that it will only be a two slot weapon (including the RL or GL).

a cost for both 0% and 100% on Ad Hoc, Elite and Vehicle percentages

got it printed at Kinko's

i tried this for the chain cannon.
HEAP.....VE...AV...1U...15/30/45/60/--...n/a.....1....n/a...un....65pv
Flech.....VE...AI... 4A...--/--/20/30/40....n/a.....-.....n/a...un....44pv
HE.........VE...AI...1.....15/30/45/60/--...3",9+..-.....n/a....6.....34pv
Smoke...VE...AI...1.....15/30/45/60/--...4",7+..-.....n/a....6.....68pv

these pv costs are before parallel combo modifications(all 4 parallel), so i end up with a final cost of 150pv. maybe knock 50% off the cost of the smoke round cause it does NO damage??
it just seems wrong that the smoke round is so expensive. i thought about just purchasing a "launcher" and adding the cost of whatever type of smoke grenade it acts like onto it. multiplying the grenade cost by the "launcher" FR.like this:

Smoke...VE...AI...2...--/15/30/45/60...3" pers....n/a...n/a...un...42pv
the launcher is 30pv. 3" persistent smoke grenade X FR2 is 12pv.