1

(42 replies, posted in Starmada)

If you want to design Starships using the VBAM K/E/B system that splits the defense types out, is there a downloadable spreadsheet that does this?


Chewy

2

(42 replies, posted in Starmada)

Thanks for the FYI Dan,

I thought I was missing something I needed to check in the spreadsheet and was just consitently overlooking it.

Glad to know I havent completely lost it!


Chewy

3

(42 replies, posted in Starmada)

Hi, I'm pretty new to Starmada X and have been playing around with Starship construction over the past couple of days.

Can someone please tell me why SXCA doesnt always line up with the Starmada X Rulebook when some of the tech levels are not 0?

I went through the Starmada X rulebook and tried to duplicate all the Imperial Starships and the Arcturan Starships with the SXCA Excel Spreadsheet.  Since all the Imperial Starships were tech 0 in all fields they all matched, but, some of the Arcturan Starships didnt match up since they are Tech 1 in Weapons and Special Equipment:

Lancer-class Acturan Corvette (23)
Results 23 (2) - Why is it illegal by 2 in SXCA?

Peregrine-class Acturan Escort (44)
Results 44 (5) - Why is it illegal by 5 in SXCA?

Thunderbolt-class Acturan Dreadnought (453)
Results 455 - Why is the combat rating 2+ more than the book

Concordia-class Acturan Command Carrier (518)
Results 518 ( 28 ) - Why is it illegal by 28 in SXCA?

Agustus-class Acturan Assault Transport (537)
Results 537 (6) - Why is it illegal by 6 in SXCA?

Seraphim-class Acturan Battle Carrier (1732)
Results 1734 (42) - Why is it illegal by 42 in SXCA & Why is the combat rating 2+ more than the book?

Am I doing something wrong while using the spreadsheet?

Thanks,

Chewy

Just wanted to say thanks to Dan and Jim for running MJXII events at Archon, in St. Louis last weekend.  We had a great time all four days and even got to fight some Starmada X battles.


Chewy
aka. Rick
Digital-Alchemy