Topic: Admiralty Revisions Summary

I have posted the revised page 10 of the Starmada Admiralty Core Rulebook to the web site:

http://www.mj12games.com/starmada/mjg0120rev.pdf

This includes the minor adjustments made to point costing in revision 1.

Daniel Kast
Majestic Twelve Games
cricket@mj12games.com

Re: Admiralty Revisions Summary

Aaaargh!

Re: Admiralty Revisions Summary

OldnGrey wrote:

Aaaargh!

Ya know...I actually heard that.   lol

Re: Admiralty Revisions Summary

Dan, would you mind putting a date for the last update to the shipbuilder?  I see various conversations, and can't tell just from looking whether I've got the latest.

I find that I don't mind this kind of revision--I don't really expect to figure ships by hand.  The only thing I wish is that the builder was a program which could read my ship description, because in order to get my ships current, I assume I'll have to enter them again into the new one.  Is there another way?

thanks
andy

Re: Admiralty Revisions Summary

andyskinner wrote:

I find that I don't mind this kind of revision--I don't really expect to figure ships by hand.  The only thing I wish is that the builder was a program which could read my ship description, because in order to get my ships current, I assume I'll have to enter them again into the new one.  Is there another way?

There has been talk of such a thing -- part of the reason why I wanted to standardize Drake Notation -- but at the moment the only option is to re-enter the information by hand.

Daniel Kast
Majestic Twelve Games
cricket@mj12games.com

Re: Admiralty Revisions Summary

I agree completely -- the shipbuilder should be able to read in files it generates (in some format)!

cricket wrote:
andyskinner wrote:

I find that I don't mind this kind of revision--I don't really expect to figure ships by hand.  The only thing I wish is that the builder was a program which could read my ship description, because in order to get my ships current, I assume I'll have to enter them again into the new one.  Is there another way?

There has been talk of such a thing -- part of the reason why I wanted to standardize Drake Notation -- but at the moment the only option is to re-enter the information by hand.