Topic: Iron Stars background depth...

From a review of Iron Stars on RPGNow.com:

DISLIKED: Background leaves many questions unanswered and the impact of some of the events is ignored other than to justify the development of Space travel. The background indicates huge, worldwide devastation but then continues with most world events as normal with no impact to the major players.

Just wondering if others observed this lack or found it distracting?

Frankly, I was assuming that the devastation of the Martian attack was limited to the major cities, leaving most of the world untouched-- while this gave the opportunity for players like South Africa and China (perhaps India?) to struggle out from under the foot of colonialism, I didn't think it would take long for the Great Powers to recover and go back to their old ways...

:?:

Daniel Kast
Majestic Twelve Games
cricket@mj12games.com

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

Well, I guess it depends on how big the Martian invasion was, and how long it lasted before the germs got 'em.  If there were thousands or tens of thousands of cylinder landings all over the planet, then maybe enough people were killed to really change the flow of history as we know it.  The Far East War in the core IS book seems to imply that that isn't the case, though. 

OTOH, if there were only a small number of landings (as an experiment, or to establish a beachhead, or as recon) and the damage was concentrated in the large cities of Europe (and perhaps America), then there might not have been great timeline changes from what we know, at least not right away.  The colonies might be a little more independent in the face of weakened European military strength, but they also wouldn't have access to captured Martian tech, which would tend to quickly restore the First World's military-technological advantage despite invasion casualties.

Of course, if the landings *were* more widespread than WotW seems to imply, then everybody gets a shot at grabbing derelict tripods and landers and the like.  The industrial nations might be more able to take advantage of the windfall at first, but even Third World countries might be able to duplicate the tech by hiring outside advisors.  "Mercenary scientists" selling technical expertise might be a hot commodity in this case, supplied no doubt by either unscrupulous industrialists, sinister anarchists, or the World Crime League.  At the very least, I'm sure Nemo will be happy to upgrade the Nautilus...heat rays are good fun.

Rich

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

I'm biased.

But honestly, I wouldn't worry about it until a number of people start expressing the opinion that the game suffers from holes.  So far, it's one guy.

I think the book that inspired the game leaves it open to your interpretation that the major powers could recover.  And honestly, I think an alternative history approach -- exploring how real-world nation stations would use this kind of equipment -- is more interesting.  It's what got me involved in the game in the first place.

Same reviewer was looking for campaign mechanics in the TMW expansion (says he assumes the book was a campaign, although I don't think the description claims anything of the kind).  I'd be more prone to looking into something like that.

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

There's always one guy that quibbles because he didn't see the story playing outthat way - I oughta know, because *I* think that way. :-)

I think that Martians didn't have things like bacteria to deal with on Mars - or they had been conquered so far in the distant past that they were forgotten.

That being said - if they had defeated us in detail in our population centers with their then-superior technology, it makes perfect sense. It's a sound military concept to hit the hardest targets first - which is what they did in the book - but they were felled by an un-noticed threat.

If they had not been felled by bacteria, we would have been hunted down in detail after they had destroyed the major military threats to them. This aruges for fewer cylinders centered on the major military powers. There's no need for thousands of cylinders, when you've got that kind of technology edge.

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

Personally I would arge for a smaller invasion.  The Martians were thinking of hitting the main industrialized centers and going from there.  When they got wiped out they had to regroup and come up with another plan. 

I figure the humans haven't been too concerned with the Martians because:

1.  Overconfidence from having delt with the first invastion.  (Even if it wasn't direct human involvement.  Afterall, wee little microbes beat 'em.)
2.  From the discription of Martian ships they don't have Cavorite.  Also Earthers may believe they have a defacto early warning system from the lights seen on Mars from their ships launching.
3.  The fact that it's been years since the Martian invasion would probably led Earth experts to conclude that the Martians put everything into the first attempt. 
4.  Problems with other Earth nations just took precidence. 

My one real big unsolved answer is the Moon.  Best guess is that what to do with it is tied up in an international conference with the decision that nobody goes until it's decided how to determine who owns it or how to recognize bases and colonies.  (Also figuring from "First Men in the Moon" that the Brits know about the Selenites and are secretly negotiating with them.)

To make a longish post short.  I don't think there's any real problem with the history so far, but it might be good to mention why there's been nothing heard about or from the Non Terrestrials.

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

Orbital mechanics alone might explain why the Martians have been quiet....waiting for another close approach, and working on their vaccines while they're at it.

OTOH, if we want the Martians to play a role in Iron Stars (other than as skeet targets), they need to have something better than interplanetary cannon shells for ships.  I still maintain we can give them proper spacecraft (saucers, of course) without contradicting Wells, whose POV characters are less than omniscient.  Make the cylinders the assault landing craft, launched from saucers in orbit rather than Mars (added advantage of being less absurd in terms of real physics), with the actual ships depending on the landing force to build a spaceport for them to land at.  Ergo, when the troops all fell over dead, the fleet was left with no choice but to bombard or withdraw...or maybe both.  Maybe some of the saucers went home to spread the news, and some are out in the Belt rigging a few kinetic weapon surprises for London...

The "lights on Mars" in that case would be the final nuclear exchange that unified Mars under one government, whilst simultaneously damaging the ecosphere beyond recovery...hence the sudden interest in finding a new place to live.

Rich

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

hundvig wrote:

Orbital mechanics alone might explain why the Martians have been quiet....waiting for another close approach, and working on their vaccines while they're at it.

That's why they landed in the arctic zones after the 1907 opposition... oops. I've said too much already. smile

OTOH, if we want the Martians to play a role in Iron Stars (other than as skeet targets), they need to have something better than interplanetary cannon shells for ships.  I still maintain we can give them proper spacecraft (saucers, of course) without contradicting Wells, whose POV characters are less than omniscient.

Sounds good to me.

The "lights on Mars" in that case would be the final nuclear exchange that unified Mars under one government, whilst simultaneously damaging the ecosphere beyond recovery...hence the sudden interest in finding a new place to live.

Or, they were in fact launches from the surface -- just not "cannon shells" that were on a direct trajectory to Earth.

So, let's assume for the moment that there are Martian saucers in orbit. What have they been doing since mid-1901?

Daniel Kast
Majestic Twelve Games
cricket@mj12games.com

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

Chad Wilson wrote:
cricket wrote:

> So, let's assume for the moment that there are Martian saucers in orbit.
> What have they been doing since mid-1901?

> Probing the anal cavities of abductees and mutilating cattle,
> of course!

Of course. How could I forget? smile

> I would have burrowed a large (and secret) base of operations
> below the surface of the moon from which to conduct my
> operations.  In 1907, things were not ready, alien agents
> were not fully in place.
>
> In that time, the Martians have modified their genetics
> through selective cross-breeding to creating martians that
> look and act like Earthlings.
>
> These cross-breeds then went to work for governments across
> the world, infiltrating every important level of operations
> to help avoid the same result of the previous invasion attempt.

Certainly some genetic manipulation is in order (or better vaccines, as Rich suggested), but I've always hated the "They Walk Among Us" cliche'.

Martian should always look like Martians-- besides, we're using the half-breed thing for Space Fleet Omega... smile

However, there would be no shortage of Humans who would be willing to cooperate with Martians in sowing chaos among the governments of Earth-- anarchists would likely have no compunction about it, or at least would be easy to manipulate.

Daniel Kast
Majestic Twelve Games
cricket@mj12games.com

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

In a brief review of the source text, there were ten "launches" from the Martian surface.

Assuming that each launch was of a single cylinder (or of a ship carrying a cylinder; let's keep it simple), and assuming the Martians intended to focus on population/industrial centers to start with and then mop up later, we should come up with a list of targets.

The largest cities in 1901 were:

London
New York
Paris
Berlin
Chicago

What other logical targets are there?

Daniel Kast
Majestic Twelve Games
cricket@mj12games.com

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

Perhaps slightly irrelevant, but there was a TV show on the BBC years ago called Tripods.  Basically dealt with the Earth under Martian Law:

"The epic story of an invaded earth was shown in 1984 and 1985.

It centred on a young man called Will who was struggling against the Tripods - giant three-legged machines that stalked the land, keeping humanity enslaved.


The Tripods was based on John Christopher's trilogy of books. Well, most of it was. The BBC did two series, and then cancelled the third - so we saw Will and his friends escape from England, fall in love, harvest grapes, join the resistance, invade the city of the Tripods, escape and then ... well, we never really found out what happened next."

Anyone read these?  May give another perspective on target cities, how the planet fell?

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

Hughestrog wrote:

Perhaps slightly irrelevant, but there was a TV show on the BBC years ago called Tripods.  Basically dealt with the Earth under Martian Law:
[...]
Anyone read these?  May give another perspective on target cities, how the planet fell?

Nope... never read them, but did see the comic strip version seralized in Boy's Life back when I was in the Scouts.

I don't think the series has much to do with WotW other than sharing the premise and the tripods.

But they could be useful if we ever allow the Martians to conquer Earth (or part of it).

Daniel Kast
Majestic Twelve Games
cricket@mj12games.com

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

Chad Wilson wrote:

> I wouldn't aim for those cities at all!  Too much of a chance
> of being repelled.
>
> Instead, I would choose a remote location low in population
> (less resistance), but high in resources.  If I were the
> martians, I would invade Africa.
>
> It would take the world's governments weeks to respond, at
> which time a base of operations would have already been
> well-established.  Factories to support Earth operations
> could be built in short-order, too.

This may be true... for the second attempt.

But the first time around, the Martians did invade at least one population center (London); and it's likely they had little fear of being repelled (for obvious reasons, as it turned out). Even now, the Martians are probably unafraid of human weapons and technology -- although they may suspect we've been busy in the years since.

Daniel Kast
Majestic Twelve Games
cricket@mj12games.com

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

Chad Wilson wrote:

> How about brain control inserts in unwilling victims and
> being forced into servitude like puppets?
>
> Those grays are pretty sneaky fellas.

That could be acceptable.

I've already decided that the Martians will be working through, with, or over the anarchist fringe... whether or not this is due to brain implants or just old-fashioned persuasion, I don't know yet.

Daniel Kast
Majestic Twelve Games
cricket@mj12games.com

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

cricket wrote:

In a brief review of the source text, there were ten "launches" from the Martian surface.

Assuming that each launch was of a single cylinder (or of a ship carrying a cylinder; let's keep it simple), and assuming the Martians intended to focus on population/industrial centers to start with and then mop up later, we should come up with a list of targets.

The largest cities in 1901 were:

London
New York
Paris
Berlin
Chicago

What other logical targets are there?


Moscow
LA
Beijing
Mexico City
Rio

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

I'll need to dig up some resources on the anarchists.  But if I recall...they probably would have allied with the Martians simply because they were a useful ally to overthrow the existing scheme of things.

BTW..did some digging on The Tripods on IMDB.  Apparantly the aliens were never mentioned as being (or not being Martian) and there's a movie version due out in 2007.

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

cricket wrote:

The largest cities in 1901 were:

London
New York
Paris
Berlin
Chicago

What other logical targets are there?

Munich, clearly.  Everybody loves pop music...even Martians.

Yeah, it's a song reference.  smile

Rich

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

hundvig wrote:
cricket wrote:

The largest cities in 1901 were:
London
New York
Paris
Berlin
Chicago
What other logical targets are there?

Munich, clearly.  Everybody loves pop music...even Martians.
Yeah, it's a song reference.  smile

Yeah, and it took me about 2 minutes to realize which one....
smile

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

So the Martians were operating under Plan 'M'?

As for collaborators with Martians I would nominate a group of Nihlists.  Take the following quotes:

"Nihilism is . . . not only the belief that everything deserves to perish; but one actually puts one's shoulder to the plough; one destroys" (Will to Power - Nietzsche)

"Let us put our trust in the eternal spirit which destroys and annihilates only because it is the unsearchable and eternally creative source of all life--the passion for destruction is also a creative passion!" (Reaction in Germany - Mikhael Bakunin)


And wouldn't the Martians be the perfect tool to destroy Earth civlization.  Basic ideology would be destroy the human race so that another dominant lifeform could evolve.  Perhaps that lifeform would be an Ubermensch that would be worthy of living.  I can just imagine the arguments this group would have with themselves.  Makes goths look like Pollyanna.

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

aresian wrote:

As for collaborators with Martians I would nominate a group of Nihlists.

That's fine as far as outright collaboration, but your run-o-the-mill anarchists will still be quite useful...

Who else is willing to set off a bomb or assassinate a polical leader with little to no prodding?

smile

Daniel Kast
Majestic Twelve Games
cricket@mj12games.com

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

Chad Wilson wrote:

> > That's fine as far as outright collaboration, but your
> run-o-the-mill
> > anarchists will still be quite useful...
> >
> > Who else is willing to set off a bomb or assassinate a
> polical leader
> > with little to no prodding?
>
> One man's anarchist becomes another man's terrorist.

True enough.

"Anarchists" are by definition "terrorists"... except that anarchists are honest about the fact that they enjoy chaos, whereas terrorists (try to) hide their evil streak behind a pseudo-political agenda...

Daniel Kast
Majestic Twelve Games
cricket@mj12games.com

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

cricket wrote:

"Anarchists" are by definition "terrorists"... except that anarchists are honest about the fact that they enjoy chaos, whereas terrorists (try to) hide their evil streak behind a pseudo-political agenda...

Well, no.  One can be an anarchist without embracing terrorism as well, at least at the philosophical level.  Terrorism is all about what is and isn't acceptable tactics in conflict.  Being an anarchist is to reject the structure of organized society in favor of self-determination.  Many anarchists (particularly the bomb-chuckers in the time period we're talking about)  are also terrorists, but they aren't really a subset of the breed.

Terror tactics are an inevitable and predictable response to an overwhelming disparity in strengths between opposed factions, whether ideological, political, religious, or other.  That doesn't excuse the behavior, or the decision to escalate a largely pointless cycle of violence, but I think it's easy to be complacent about the way the "accepted rules of conflict" work when they favor your side.  You have to expect the underdog to at least try to bite, no matter how futile it may be in the long run.

Not that I'm thinking about any current situations, no sir, strictly Edwardian era thinking here.

Rich

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

hundvig wrote:

Well, no.  One can be an anarchist without embracing terrorism as well, at least at the philosophical level.  Terrorism is all about what is and isn't acceptable tactics in conflict.  Being an anarchist is to reject the structure of organized society in favor of self-determination.  Many anarchists (particularly the bomb-chuckers in the time period we're talking about)  are also terrorists, but they aren't really a subset of the breed.

I'll resist the urge to escalate the subject creep and just say I see your point.

smile

Bringing us back to topic, I think it's becoming obvious that there were factions in the world that would be ripe for Martian plucking, so to speak, while they readied themselves for the inevitable second Invasion.

I guess I've been assuming from Day One that the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand would have been orchestrated by Others -- but whether those are Martians per se, or Someone Else, I haven't quite figured out yet...

And don't forget we've got about 5 years still to cover before we get to WW1. And someone was saying we were moving too quickly... smile

Dan

Daniel Kast
Majestic Twelve Games
cricket@mj12games.com

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

We're accepting Wells' work as canonical (well, within limits...the War in the Air thing clearly didn't/doesn't happen as written), what about other writers' from the period?  Are we borrowing at all from Verne...does Nemo sail the seas, Robur roam the skies, and has there been a cannon shell shot to the moon?  Or Griffin...while Honeymoon and the Tsar Wars stuff clearly can't happen as written, that creepy SOB Natas and his Terrorists would make an excellent catspaw for the (Wells) Martians.  And how about Sherlock Holmes and Moriarty?  I've got a soft spot for the World Crime League myself...

Rich

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

hundvig wrote:

We're accepting Wells' work as canonical (well, within limits...the War in the Air thing clearly didn't/doesn't happen as written),

Actually, with a bit of fudging, you could make WitA fit. But it changes entirely the balance of power on Earth as I see it shaping up in IS.

what about other writers from the period?  Are we borrowing at all from Verne...does Nemo sail the seas, Robur roam the skies, and has there been a cannon shell shot to the moon?  Or Griffin...while Honeymoon and the Tsar Wars stuff clearly can't happen as written, that creepy SOB Natas and his Terrorists would make an excellent catspaw for the (Wells) Martians.  And how about Sherlock Holmes and Moriarty?  I've got a soft spot for the World Crime League myself...

I'm open to any and all suggestions.

However, I don't recognize "Tsar Wars" or "Natas"...

Daniel Kast
Majestic Twelve Games
cricket@mj12games.com

Re: Iron Stars background depth...

aresian wrote:

As for collaborators with Martians I would nominate a group of Nihlists.  Take the following quotes:

"Nihilism is . . . not only the belief that everything deserves to perish; but one actually puts one's shoulder to the plough; one destroys" (Will to Power - Nietzsche)

"Let us put our trust in the eternal spirit which destroys and annihilates only because it is the unsearchable and eternally creative source of all life--the passion for destruction is also a creative passion!" (Reaction in Germany - Mikhael Bakunin)

I read this, and realized that the Nazi's were -largely- Nihilist. I had to look it up on the net, seems to me that Nihilism is Satanism gone amok.<shrug>


aresian wrote:

And wouldn't the Martians be the perfect tool to destroy Earth civlization.  Basic ideology would be destroy the human race so that another dominant lifeform could evolve.  Perhaps that lifeform would be an Ubermensch that would be worthy of living.  I can just imagine the arguments this group would have with themselves.  Makes goths look like Pollyanna.

I'm thinking un-organized proto-Nazi's without the snazzy uniforms. They'd be out to destroy the human race, certain they could keep the genie in the bottle...