You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Play nice. (This means you.)
Logins from the previous forum have been carried over; if you have difficulty logging in, please try resetting your password before contacting us. Attachments did not survive the migration--many apologies, but we're lucky we kept what we could!
mj12games.com/forum → Discussion → Huh?
Found this while searching the 'net for something else entirely...
I won't play ANY Civil War game whose Gaussian curves fail a Chi-squared test at anything less than a 95% confidence level. I simply will not lower my standards to such mediocrity - be warned.
Um... say what now?
You know, I think I'd be inclined to agree with him.
Found this while searching the 'net for something else entirely...
I won't play ANY Civil War game whose Gaussian curves fail a Chi-squared test at anything less than a 95% confidence level. I simply will not lower my standards to such mediocrity - be warned.
Um... say what now?
If it was a square root of the Chi, it would make a whole lot more sense to me. 
It's good to see there are still some gamers with standards!
Erik
and they complain to us about the square root!
He's confident that a Gaussian rooted his chi?
He's confident that a Gaussian rooted his chi?
No, no... the Gaussian SQUARED his chi.
smokingwreckage wrote:He's confident that a Gaussian rooted his chi?
No, no... the Gaussian SQUARED his chi.
Doesn't that make it a chi-A? :geek:
cricket wrote:smokingwreckage wrote:He's confident that a Gaussian rooted his chi?
No, no... the Gaussian SQUARED his chi.
Doesn't that make it a chi-A? :geek:
Sill me, I was thinking it would be a chi chi. And who needs a chichi frufru kind of ACW game anyway? And what the heck are Gauss cannons doing in a civil war game anyway?
mj12games.com/forum → Discussion → Huh?
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.