Topic: IS v Starmada
One of the things I have been noticing with the Starmada version of IS is that Adm Fisher's desire to only fire to the front has won the day. Meaning the firing arcs for ships are quite different.
In IS it is the acme of success to cross an enemy's "T" with a broadside (as the broadside is area allowing all guns to fire unmasked). But, in the Starmada version the primaries seem to be set up to fire only in the ABCD arcs. Why the change if we are trying to get the feel of IS to Starmada gamers? :?
Faceted shielding/armor? That's not a staple of IS either but it's part of the crossover product and doesn't make sense again in the context of giving Starmada players a taste of IS. :?
Was this really just an attempt to add a few more gee whiz gadgets and a new universe to the Starmada arena? I could see that more than I could see it drawing Starmada players to IS.
I also noticed that several of the ships that should have ammo listed don't. :oops:
The great ships Adm Dugan has produced seem to match Starmada more than IS anyway as they show main batteries forward of the superstructure but nothing in the back (although the IJEN seems to have it figured out ). I guess that is because they would interfere with the ether sails and propellors? If this is the case it is unlikely for the IS firing arcs to be accurate as most ships as pictured couldn't shoot into their rear arc. :shock:
I like the Starmada rules (however, I'd really like a section that allowed for hexless movement!) and I really like IS. I don't think the Starmada AE rules as presented really captures the tactical feel of IS, but it does an admirable job of creating new Starmada rules.
I was wondering if you used any particular historical ship classes to model the Aetherships in IS?
If someone could tell me which ship matched which class I'd appreciate it. I want to build/create a USEN to use and I want to make it as faithful to the IS designs that have been used so far.