andyskinner wrote:Thanks. But what I meant by "use" was whether you spread them out across the table, or what? The FT ship records are small enough to put a fleet on a page (with space for orders on another sheet). The Starmada ones don't look like they'll shrink well.
andy
I find if I fiddle around with cut-and-paste functions a bit, I can fit a squadron of a dozen average mid-sized (hull 10-14) ships on one page, although that may vary if they have a lot of special equipment or weapon batteries (anything with lots of check boxes to track). You can save a lot of space by putting all the ships of the same type together as well...no need to duplicate the hit chart over and over that way. Overall, it doesn't seem any more difficult to do layouts for than Full Thrust...if nothing else you don't need a special font for making your own designs.
As for conversions, I'd done some very rough attempts to model the Phalons into Starmada way back when, but abandoned it when I realized I'd rather just build new designs for them with no direct attempt to refer to FT. The best approach for choosing hull sizes is probably to pick the largest model you're likely to convert (probably some SDN or CVA) and assign that Hull 20 (or 18-19 if you want some wiggle room for later), and the smallest ship (recon scout, no doubt) Hull 1, and then sort of fill in the range from there. Starmada can handle size 21+ ships, but they start getting very, very slow and unfeasibly expensive as they grow past size 15 or so.
One thing you will notice, In Starmada you can usually afford a lot more small ships for the price of a big one than you can in FT, since the Hull Size system isn't strictly linear.
Rich