No, its not your fault. Its my own fault--the way I wrote out ships (copy-pasting previous ships and then altering the relevant information) in the SAE settings was intended to reduce the actual time taken to type them out, but every so often, primarily because my attention wandered, errors crept in. The overall ratio of ships with errors to total number of ships was likely low, but being a perfectionist made it difficult for me every time I saw I'd made an error. The latest one in the Interregnum supplement was just the proverbial straw.

I've also been suffering from the supplement designer's equivalent of writers block--over the last few weeks I've had a few half-formed ideas separated by long periods of time looking blankly into space. In a few days/weeks/months I might be able to produce a decent amount of new supplements, but ATM...nothing...

After a bit of thinking, I'm going to be doing what I was tempted to do initially--re-do my supplements as S:NE originals, rather than do conversions of the SAE ones. I won't be re-releasing the SAE supplements, though.

The reason for this is I found two errors in the Warring Triumvirate: the Nhilka's lance cannons were allocated 162 SUs (which is 6 times the light lance cannon's SUs of 27) but for some reason I wrote it up, and kept writing it up, as [A] [B] arcs, which was only 4 times the LLC's SUs. The second was the incorrect SU costing of the Olhaz plasma repeater, when for some reason I divided the SU cost by 3 (for an ACC of 3+), but listed it as 4+. The realisation of those two errors, in quick succession, just got to me a bit, especially as I realised I'd have to re-write everything...again...