I'm trying to put together a multi-universe conversion (Star Trek, Star Wars, etc.), and since this involves a lot of ships, I'd like to use the SXCA instead of doing it by hand. But... It seems as if there are issues with how the SXCA calculates Combat Rating. As an example, here's the Victory II-class Star Destroyer. First, by hand:
Victory II-class Star Destroyer
Tech Levels: 0 all
Length: 900 meters
Armament: 20 turbolaser batteries, 20 double turbolaser batteries, 10 ion cannons, 10 tractor beam projectors
Fighters: 2 TIE squadrons (12 fighters each)
Hull: 12
Space Units: 2,520
Engine Factor: 199
Shield Factor: 125
Shields: 4 (500 SUs)
Engines: 5 (995 SUs)
Battery A: Turbolaser Batteries. Range 9, To-hit 4+, ROF 3, Pen 1, DMG 1 (SU for all: 162)
Arcs: AC, AC, BD, BD, CE, DF
Battery B: Double Turbolaser Batteries. Range 9, To-hit 4+, ROF 3, Pen 2, DMG 1 (SU for all: 324)
Arcs: AC, AC, BD, BD, CE, DF
Battery C: Ion Cannons. Range 9, To-hit 4+, ROF 2, Pen 1, DMG 1. (Ignores Shields; No Hull Damage) (SU for all: 108)
Arcs: AB, AC, BD
Special Equipment:
Fighter Bays 4 (TIE/In) (200 SU)
Launch Bay 1 (10 SU)
Marine Squads 10 (80 SU)
Security Teams 10 (20 SU)
Troops 7 (70 SU)
Vehicle Bays 2 (50 SU)
SU Cost: 2,519
Offensive Rating:
Battery A 252
Battery B 504
Battery C 168
Base 720
Special Equipment: 325
Sum: 2294
Defensive Rating:
Base 72
Special Equipment Multipliers: 1
Special Equipment Adders: 325
Result: 397
Combat Rating: 955
And then as returned by the SXCA. I made all the same design choices, but these are the SUs, Offensive Rating, Defensive Rating, and Combat Rating it returned...
Battery A: SU 18
Battery B: SU 36
Battery C: SU 23.6
Offensive Rating: 1,318.2
Defensive Rating: 397.0
Combat Rating: 723
So... why the 232-point discrepancy? Did I do the math wrong by hand, and if so, where? If it is the SXCA, how can I fix it? It looks like it's drastically undercounting the cost of the weapon batteries.
(Also, this SXCA file is one I just downloaded about 30 minutes ago from the main Starmada page, so I assume it's the most up to date.)