cricket wrote:Andromedan wrote:Now, why Phaser-3s would get it (and why they have Anti-Fighter in SAE) would be because of the purpose of the Phaser-3s which is purely defensive.
Yes.
More to the point, it increases the defensive purpose of Ph-3. In FC, Ph-3 are defensive weapons not because they are better against fighters and drones than other phasers. In fact, they are less good than other phasers (not on a energy basis, though). A ph-3 may miss a drone at range 1 where a Ph-1. But a Ph-3 costs half the Ph-1 power and whatever, you usually use Ph-3 at very close range.
But, with opportunity, many Ph-3, or better, some Ph-G, may inflict heavy damage on enemy ships at point blank range. I remember a game of SFB where a Fed DD with 4 Ph-G (it was special rules from our scenario) destroyed a D6 at range 1, firing two turns in a row...
Marc